Fewer Toxins in Toyland

by Sarah (Steve) Mosko, PhD
Also see an update to this article, Too Fewer Toxins in Toyland, that incorporates stalled legislation in California aimed at protecting young children from risky chemicals.
California has moved to restrict use of toxic phthalate plasticizers in PVC children's toys.  Photo courtesy of Center for Environmental Health and Justice.

California has moved to restrict use of toxic phthalate plasticizers in PVC children's toys. Photo courtesy of Center for Environmental Health and Justice.

This holiday season, parents shopping for children can rest a tad easier because of a recent California law restricting the use of toxic phthalate plasticizers in toys and childcare products made of plastic. Additional classes of chemicals suspected of posing health risks to children, bisphenol A and halogenated flame retardants, could be reined in before long too, pending the fate of two struggling state senate bills.

But, perhaps the best news of all is that California has enacted laws establishing a groundbreaking precautionary approach to the oversight of all chemicals that should soon make painstaking chemical-by-chemical regulation a thing of the past.

Phthalate Plasticizers

Articles made of polyvinyl chloride plastic require the addition of chemical “plasticizers” to make them soft and pliable. Effective January 2009 in California, the allowable level in children’s toys and childcare products of six phthalate plasticizers, the industry favorites for decades, has been strictly limited because of potentially harmful effects on the developing reproductive system.

Teethers, soft plastic books and rubber duckies are examples of the items affected. Virtually all Americans have measureable levels of phthalates in their bodies, and youngsters’ habit of exploring their environment orally is thought to be a major route of exposure. The law specifically prohibits substituting phthalate plasticizers with carcinogenic or endocrine disrupting substances.

Bisphenol A

The chemical bisphenol A (BPA) was first synthesized a century ago as an estrogen hormone mimic but employed instead to make polycarbonate plastics upon discovery that it could be polymerized into a shatter-proof material. It is widely used in plastic baby bottles and is also a key component of the resin that lines food cans and jar lids, including infant formula.

BPA is routinely found in human tissues, and children have the highest levels. The main route of exposure seems to be leaching from food or drink containers into the contents. Over 200 scientific studies connect BPA to a diversity of problems like early puberty, miscarriage, breast and prostate cancer, obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cardiac arrythmias.

Pending California legislation proposes a statewide ban, effective January 1, 2011, on the manufacture or sale of containers (bottles, cups, jars, cans) or foods and liquids with more than a trace of BPA (> 0.1 ppb) when the item is designed for children aged three years or less (SB 797, Pavley). This bill took on added importance when a state EPA panel decided on July 15, 2009 not to require warning labels on BPA-containing products under California’s Proposition 65 which applies to carcinogens and reproductive toxins.

Connecticut, Minnesota, Chicago, and Suffolk County, NY have already passed legislation restricting BPA in children’s drinkware or foodware.

Flame Retardants

A new state bill is proposing to remove “an obsolete state regulation requiring juvenile bedding and mattress products to be treated with highly toxic flame retardants….” (SB 772, Leno).

California law requires that seating furniture and bedding materials meet strict flammability standards typically met by treatment with halogenated flame retardants, a family of chemicals linked to a host of health concerns including cancer, reproductive problems, birth defects, thyroid dysfunction and learning disabilities. In 2008, California banned two of the halogenated formulations, but others remain in widespread usage. Avenues of exposure in infants include direct skin or oral contact.

By specifically exempting strollers, infant carriers, bassinets and nursing pillows from the state flammability regulation, the proposed legislation aims to minimize infant and toddler exposure to flame retardants at a critical period in development. All exempted articles would carry a permanent label to that effect.

Lack of support in the Assembly Appropriations committee doomed this bill for the current legislative session although it will be reconsidered next year, according to Senator Leno’s office.

Green Chemistry Initiative

Governor Schwarzenegger signed two bills in 2008 crafted to completely revamp how California approaches protecting humans and the environment from hazardous chemicals.

Under previous law, California’s governmental agencies lacked the authority to ensure that chemicals used in consumer products are safe, even when science identifies risks to humans and wildlife. As a result, the California legislature has been forced to decide, on a chemical-by-chemical basis, if a marketed substance with a history of toxicity should be banned.

Under the new Green Chemistry initiative’s sweeping reforms, California’s Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) is mandated to identify risky chemicals in consumer products and take regulatory actions aimed at manufacturers and distributors, including bans, restrictions and required warning labels. Whether consumers will have available any mechanisms to readily identify the chemical constituents of specific products, such as through obligatory product labels, remains unresolved but is an “aspiration” of the DTSC according to spokesperson Rick Bausch.

A companion law requires creation of a web-based Toxics Information Clearinghouse to enable consumers to track the safety of chemicals used in everyday products. Together, this duo lays the framework for the most comprehensive regulation of its kind in the nation, although shoppers won’t realize any benefits before January 2011 when both programs are slated to take effect.

In the meanwhile, whether California’s kids will be protected specifically against BPA or flame retardants is still being debated, and so far the chemical industry and other opponents of restricting these chemicals are winning.

Related Boogie Green article: Toxins in Toyland

4 Responses to Fewer Toxins in Toyland

  1. This is a great article, for its content and style. It is now on CultureChange.org. I wish boogiegreen had separate URLs for each article so that one can direct others to particular articles (I’ve tried Firefox and Safari).
    Steve, your series is most promising. Good luck and thank you.
    Jan Lundberg
    Sail Transport Network
    Pedal Power Produce
    Portland, Ore. (Paveland, Ore-is-Gone — but I love it)

  2. Thank you for your kind words. I am honored to be posted on CultureChange.org. Jan, your tireless efforts to move us from a petroleum-based culture to a sustainable one are laudable to say the least.

    BTW, there are separate URLs for each article. Click on the posting title and it will direct you to a new page at the specific URL. The URL for this article is:

  3. […] Fewer Toxins in Toyland by Sarah (Steve) Mosko This is an updated version of Fewer Toxins in Toyland that incorporates recently stalled legislation in California aimed at protecting young children […]

  4. klonopin says:

    Hello there, You’ve done an incredible job. I will definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I’m sure they’ll be benefited from this web site.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: