By Sarah “Steve” Mosko
Versions have appeared:
Escondido Grapevine, 05-Dec, 2017
Fullerton Observer, Mid-Nov, 2017 (p.17)
Algalita Marine Research Foundation Blog, 05-Nov, 2017
Daily Pilot, 03-Nov, 2017
Voice of OC, 02-Nov, 2017
San Diego Free Press, 02-Nov., 2017
Times of San Diego, 31-Oct, 2017
E-The Environmental Magazine, 27-Oct, 2017
Though burning fossil fuels is the primary cause of global warming, fossil fuels could also be driving climate change via a completely different mechanism involving ocean plastic debris and tiny, bioluminescent fish living hundreds of meters beneath the ocean’s surface.
Lanternfish (aka myctophids) are only a few inches long typically but so ubiquitous that they account for over half the ocean’s total fish-mass. They are vital to the ocean’s ability to sequester more carbon than all the world’s forests do on land through a daily mass migration that plays out in all seven seas.
By day, lanternfish avoid predators in deep, dimly lit waters, but they ascend nightly to the surface to gorge on carbon-rich plankton before descending back down where they deposit their carbon-rich poop. They also sequester carbon when eaten by larger fish.
Carbon sequestration by lanternfish is central to the overall role of marine environments in reducing human-caused CO2 emissions in the atmosphere – by an estimated 20-35 percent.
Thus, anything harmful to lanternfish could hinder the ocean’s capacity to act as a carbon sink. Alarming evidence that small bits of floating plastic debris resemble the plankton lanternfish feast on could spell trouble for them and, consequently, the climate.
Lanternfish are consuming ocean plastics
Most plastics are still derived from petroleum and natural gas and, for practical purposes, are non-biodegradable, even though they fragment during weathering into progressively smaller pieces.
Marine debris is composed primarily of plastics which accumulate in circulating ocean convergence zones called gyres. Since the groundbreaking discovery by the Algalita Marine Research Foundation in 1999 that plastic debris outweighed zooplankton in the surface waters of the N. Pacific gyre by a ratio of 6:1, there has been concern that small plastic fragments might be mistaken for food by plankivorous sea life.
A follow-up study revealed that more than a third of the stomachs of lanternfish captured at the ocean’s surface in the N. Pacific gyre contained plastic fragments. Importantly, ingested plastics were similar in size (1-3 mm) and color (clear, white and blue) to the area’s zooplankton.
Researchers at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography confirmed that lanternfish are consuming plastics and estimated that the weight of plastic debris consumed annually by fish in the in the N. Pacific gyre alone is 10s of tons.
Ingestion of plastic debris by lanternfish is thought to explain an otherwise head-scratching finding. Mass quantities of the plastics that are entering the ocean are disappearing, according to scientists who measured plastic debris in the surface waters of all five of the world’s major gyres. Importantly, the missing plastic is largely debris 2-3 mm in size, matching the lanternfish’s plankton diet.
Intestinal blockage, malnutrition and starvation are obvious potential dangers of consuming plastic debris, though chemicals associated with marine plastics might pose greater threats.
Oily toxic pollutants commonly found in seawater adsorb to the surface of plastics. Once ingested, the pollutants can transfer to the tissues of wildlife with potential for transfer up the food chain as smaller fish are eaten by larger ones.
Threat also stems from the basic building blocks of some polymers. Polycarbonate plastic, for example, is derived from BPA (bisphenol A), an estrogen mimic so harmful to the development of lab animals that use of polycarbonate plastics in baby bottles and sippy cups was banned in the United States in 2012.
The basic constituents of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polystyrene plastics are known or suspected carcinogens.
The myriad of additives which impart desired properties to plastic products add another layer of concern. Phthalate plasticizers and polybrominated flame retardants are common additives which interfere with hormonal systems in mammals, for example. Because additives are not bonded to the plastic polymer, they can leach out of ingested plastics into an organism’s tissues.
A recent study documented contamination of lanternfish tissue with chemicals both manufactured into plastics and adsorbed from seawater.
Furthermore, the buoyancy of plastics might interfere with the lanternfish’s ability to complete its migration from the surface back down to deeper waters, critical to sequestering carbon in the ocean’s depth.
Ocean plastic pollution to increase further
If lanternfish eating plastic debris represents a threat to climate stability, the situation is projected to only get worse.
Half of all plastics that ever existed were produced in just the last 13 years, according to a first-ever accounting of all plastic created anywhere on Earth since 1950. Of the 6300 million metric tons of plastic waste ever generated through 2015, roughly one-fifth has been recycled or incinerated, leaving four-fifths amassed in landfills or in the natural environment.
If current trends prevail through 2050, landfills and the natural environment will have accumulated 12,000 million metric tons of plastic waste.
In another first-ever study, researchers estimated how much plastic waste is entering the ocean yearly from the mismanaged discards of people in coastal countries worldwide – between 4.8 and 12.7 million metric tons or 1-5 percent of plastics generated.
Depending on buoyancy, some plastics float while others sink to the bottom or distribute throughout the water column. Given the ocean’s expanse and the rate that new plastics are entering, open ocean cleanup schemes are not a feasible solution.
At the heart of the global climate crisis is mankind’s dysfunctional relationship to fossil fuels. As in any bad relationship, ignoring the problem only kicks the can down the road while the problem continues to fester.
In this case the road leads to greater climate instability which, in the very least, portends more violent storms and droughts, spread of human diseases, social, economic and political upheavals and mass species extinction.
The needed relational shift is to transition from an economy based on fossil fuels as a primary source of energy and material feedstock for manufactured goods to one thriving on renewable energy sources and manufactured goods which are biodegradable or easily recycled. Abandoning single-use plastics is also an imperative.
Excellent writing Steve. I who is not in the mainstream of this scientific news can actually understand this domino effect. I was captivated from Line one through to the close. This article as you already know is a hard sell, but, needs to be told and absorbed by all of us “Lanternfish”. I believe the timeframe 2050 might be extending these obvious concerns. Well done, seriously! Don’t stop, people are listening. Regards Russ, Artist, Fine Art Studio
Another GREAT article. I have forwarded this on to Anna Cummins who gives talks on plastic in the ocean. She spoke to us on September 19, 2017